As much as I love beautiful landscapes and landscape photography (and painting!), the format this website uses to display them (a 900-pixel wide container) makes these panoramic photographs... really tiny.

I'm sure this is a beautiful photograph, but I see only a shadow of it, through no fault of the photographer. Perhaps, for the writeoff, at least, it may have been better to crop the photo so viewers can see more of it detail?

>>Hap
A trick that works in most web browsers to view the maximum resolution is to right click on the image and choose "open image in new tab". Mobile users can usually press and hold on the image to get a menu. Failing that, you should be able to save the image and open the file in an image viewer.

>>GroaningGreyAgony
That only brings it up to the maximum 1800 pix width. Better, but still not the full beauty that I'm sure was captured originally.

Another beautiful shot, but relation to the prompt is questionable.

I'm agreeing with >>Moosetasm in that the relation to the prompt seems pretty tenuous. Another problem, going off of this, is that there's no real subject. It's a landscape shot, and a very nicely done one, but what are we supposed to get from this?

I wonder what my high school photography teacher would say.

I think it bears a fair enough relation to the prompt, as long as one interprets "they" to mean either the mountains, or the photographer himself/herself.